![]() ![]() For XP, it took 2 minutes and 54 seconds, for Vista with SP1 it took 2 minutes and 29 seconds. In a test run by CRN Test Center, a 1.25 GB file was copied from a network share to each desktop. File copy operations are speculated to be one area where Vista performs better than XP. Initial performance tests have demonstrated that Windows XP outperforms Vista in several productivity areas. This number is low compared to the number of programs that were compatible with XP in 2007, either natively or under emulation. As of August 2007, there were about 2,000 applications that specifically carried the 'Vista Compatibility Logo', although the majority of applications without the logo will run without any problems. ![]() Windows Vista faces backward compatibility problems with many of the games and utility programs that work in Windows XP. Another common criticism of Vista concerns the integration of new forms of DRM into the operating system, and User Account Control (UAC) security technology. Vista has received criticism for issues with performance and product activation. ![]() Windows XP has suffered criticism for security problems and issues with performance. Windows XP and Windows Vista differ considerably in regards to their security architecture, networking technologies, management and administration, shell and user interface, and mobile computing. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |